We all know Latin numerical counting starts from one; it has no place
for Zero. This limits arithmetic’s to plus & minus only; multiplication &
division is possible up to two digits, forget all other facilities’ of
mathematics’.
In India, Zero (shoonya) exist ever since starting of civilization or
one may say since Vedas came in existence.
Literal meaning of Zero is nil. Decimal was also not possible without Zero.
But it means full (Poorna ) also in philosophy, advanced mathematics and cosmology. They consider
everything starts with Zero and finishes at Zero (a complete cycle). Mathematics
in Veda also uses Zero as shoonya(nil) as well as, Poorna(complete).
The great mathematician Arya Bhatt, introduced Zero to Arab world; (but
did not invent). From Arab world (as Egypt & Iraq were also well advances
in arithmetic’s). It went to rest of the world. In turn they consider Arya Bhatt
invented Zero; as they did / do not know about advancement and civilization of India.
There is an Egyptian joke:
“What India did; they invented zero
(nothing)”.
The worst part of the subject is, our anthropologist (mentally slaves of
western knowledge & culture), also say Zero was invented by Arya Bhatt.
A little about Sri Arya Bhatt
Arya Bhatta was born 476 A.D in Taregana, a
place in Patliputra in Magadha; is presently
Patna in Bihar. There are
several tales of claim
for his origins. Many believe that he was born
in the south India around the Kerala region
and lived in Magadha at the time of the Gupta
Rulers;
time which is known as the golden age
of India. There is no evidence that he was
born
outside Patliputra and traveled to Magadha,
the
centre of instruction, culture and knowledge
for
his studies where he even set up a coaching
institute.
His first name "Arya" is not a south
Indian
name while "Bhatt" (or sometimes Bhatta)
is
a typical north Indian name. The name is popular
even
today in India especially among the trader
Community
of north India.
(by courtesy GOOGLE)
Hello!
ReplyDeleteWhat a coincidence! http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0053
And this one is very interesting: http://gmanjusainath.blogspot.com/2012/03/poorna-story-of-zero-by-cipher.html
Why, do you think, poorna is not a part of the [international] numerical sequence?
Thanks for your post about shoonya/poorna.