KHAKI

Most of us are not aware of history of military uniform colour KHAKI.

This colour was idea of an Indian soldier of British army.

·       It became the main cause of victory of British army on Indian kings (Rajas).

·       With the time it became a universal colour for army around the world.

Originally the colour of army uniform used to be bright red; in turn the defenders were able to locate them from a long distance and get prepared. Hence the attackers had to face defeat.

One Indian soldier of British army noticed this and pointed out to officers. He suggested, for camouflage the colour of uniform should be of dust.

The name of colour is named KHAKI as dust is called Khak in Urdu. 

Will you accept it if your son/daughter announces that he/she is gay? How would you handle the situation? #Love Is Love

Who am I to govern the life of my children once they become adult?

After bringing the child to the earth, my actions are limited to breeding and providing education till he becomes adult and supports himself.

I believe most of likes, dislikes and temperament of a person are his own.

Further, whether I like or dislike, how does it matter to the descendant.

If we look at the problem:

·       Medically:                     Anybody being heterosexual or gay is controlled by

the hormones. In turn, even the individual himself is not responsible for it.

·       Constitutionally:            Any adult, is completely responsible of his personal

                                   actions; so long no one is harmed.

·       Socially:                       their is no use of talking, as  behaviour of society

has no characteristics. An example is sited.

A man is beating his wife in public place.

-       Society says “it is their personal matter.”

A man is hugging and kissing his wife in public place.

-       Society says “they are shameless.”

Hence it can be theorised, the opinion of society has no value.

HONEY DIET

INDIBLOGGERS MEET OF 04 July 2015 AT BANGALURU

                        THE DABUR HONEY DIET

HONEY DIET is diabetic friendly. I myself am diabetic.

Hence I will concentrate on HONEY DIET and DIABETES. Let us revise the heading to HONEY DIET and DIABETES.

My diabetes problem was diagnosed in year 1993.

Doctors tell us to be away from sweet. Whereas they should distance us from sugar not sweet.

The above statement is not complete; as all carbohydrates we consume are digested after converting to sugar (sucrose). The main items in the list are wheat, rice and fat.

Over all we have to control calories produced by the meal.

Let us understand the term diabetes; the pancreas of patient is not functioning properly, hence he has problem of diabetes and is called diabetic.

The only precautions he has to take; he should not load the pancreas.

·       For that he should not consume sugar and carbohydrates; more precisely sucrose.

·       The problem becomes magnanimous as carbohydrates convert to sucrose before getting digested. They are the main content of our complete meal.

·       Do not permit increase of sugar level in the body.

Pancreas’ work is to adjust the level of sugar in blood and it handles only sucrose. Not sweets containing glucose and fructose. Hence reasonable amount can be consumed keeping the sugar level right. Pancreas does not help in digestion of these so the calories are to be burnt by physical and mental labour only.

Most of mothers feed their children glucose. The reason is the pancreas; a very sensitive organ is not loaded unnecessary.

So a diabetic can also have glucose and fructose without loading the pancreas. The only problem is, he has to digest these sweets by physical & mental labour to keep the sugar level normal in the body.

HONEY is combination of glucose and fructose; hence is an ideal diet for diabetics.

Dates also carry the same with additional quality of controlling the sugar level.

Very few fruits contain sucrose.

In a layman’s language, any sweet which

·       Crystallises is sucrose.

·       Do no crystallise are glucose or fructose.

Doctors instruct diabetics not consume most of fruits like, mango, banana, chikoo, custard apple etc. But there sweet content cannot be crystallized, hence can be consumed in reasonable quantity.

If HONEY contains glucose and fructose only, it will never crystallise. In case crystals are formed, sugar is mixed in the concoction; I will not call it HONEY. Even when it is dried or dehydrated only viscosity is increased.

Glucose and fructose do not react with each other; hence the mixture HONEY shall never crystallize.

Lots of people were looking for cure of OBESITY by consuming HONEY WITH WARM WATER. I cannot comment on that; as I do not know medicinal characteristics of HONEY, but tell a much simpler solution.

Stop consuming salt.

-       For details refer blog my next blog.

  

I myself was weighing 84 kg, now am study at 60 kg for more than 5 years.

The technical (medical) reason is, our body contains about 88% water, so we have to get rid of water in the body. The water is held in the body as compounds of salt only. Hence reduce the item which is holding water.

One person asked, can HONEY be given to child to increase his vocabulary? There is no comment on this, but it is assured, it will not harm as HONEY does not interact with pancreas.

There is not much of research on benefit of HONEY; But is benifical all the way. One may call it NECTOR.

MOTHER’S COOKING

Every mother’s cooking is the best.

The cooking of the same lady; is normal, good or bad to everyone else in the family including father (her husband).

Let us talk about food only, we may take dinner very late, may be in wee hours of morning. Still when we get up in the morning breakfast is required.

How cooking of every mother (Lady) can be best. It can be best to her decadents only.

Talking of me, till my adolescence the main cooking was done by my grandmother. My mother used to the associated works only and assist my grandmother. In my opinion my grandmother was the best cook.

The point is; it is not the cooking but our habit that makes the difference. We are habituated to taste of her cooking, hence we like it most.

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (QUANTUM OF SECULARISM)

After independence of India in 1947; first job for the Government of India was to write constitution of such a big country. India had some big challenges. The constitution had to be uniform for people of all

Religions        (India has maximum number)

Languages      (India has maximum number)

Cultures        (India has maximum number)

Customs        (India has maximum number)

At that time the biggest scholar and well versed person of the complete situation and circumstances Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected President of the

Constituent Assembly of India.

This body prepared the Constitution of India.

It may be noted he was follower of Sanatan Culture (Hindu Dharma). It was

not important at that time but later developments, made by Indian National Congress, in the name of Secularism, made it very significant today.

Dr. Bhimrau Ramji Ambedkar was Chairman of the

Constitution Drafting Committee        

- from August 29, 1947      to       January 24, 1950

He was first Minister of Law and Justice

from August 15, 1947          to       September 1951

This body wrote (Jotted down) the Constitution of India

Any man converted to any religion in first person, cannot be secular.

In turn honestly write a secular constitution.

India became Republic on January 26, 1950. Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected first President by the Constituent Assembly of India. Following the General election of 1951, he was elected President by the electoral college of the first Parliament of India.   

As president of India Dr. Rajendra Prasad established a tradition of being fully free of all liabilities of political or other organizations. In turn retired from Congress party and politics.

Still as head of state, he encouraged the development of education in India and advised the Nehru government on several occasions. In 1957, Dr. Rajendra Prasad was again elected the President for the second term.

Dr. Bhimrau Ramji Ambedkar was also a well learned man but younger in age. He was basically from a Dalit family, later converted Buddhist. He was not secular by thoughts in turn his actions were also not secular.

He had converted 70,000 other Dilits to Buddhism.

He could not impress upon his ideas, on language of the constitution, as it was impossible to mend even, a word placed by Dr. Rajenda Prasad. But he impressed well upon the national symbols as they were decided by the parliament of India.

It may be noted the basics of Indian constitution are based upon the constitution of United Kingdome. Hence all the power lies in hand of Prime Minister and the Crown (in U. K.) and president (in India) is not more than a stamp.

We all know general knowledge and I.Q. level of our first Prime Minister. So it was not difficult to impress any ideas upon him.

Our National Flag and Emblems both are not secular and are symbols of Buddhism. They carry the name first emperor of India King Ashok. He had taken both the symbols from Buddhism.

refer my blog secular India for details   

History tells epic MAHABHARAT was composed by VED-VYAS. It was very difficult to write down such a big epic, so he prayed to deity GANESH and he agreed to pen it. So literally deity GANESH jotted down the book, but nobody refers deity GANESH has written of it. Everyone takes name of VED-VYAS only.

Our first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (God son of Mahatma Gandhi) was dwarf in every facility in front of Dr. Rajendra Prasad. Just to degrade Dr. Rajendra Prasad, he projected Dr. Bhimrau Ramji Ambedkar as writer of constitution. We read every where Dr. Bhimrau Ramji Ambedkar, as writer of constitution, whereas his role was similar to deity GANESH in case of MAHABHARAT.

Even today decedents of Neharu “Owners of Indian National Congress” propagate themselves as God Fathers and protectors of Dalits. They keep on advertising Dr. Ambedkar was a Dalit. They ignore the facts and keep uneducated Dalits in dark. The moment Dr. Ambedkar converted Buddhist, he was out of Dalit class. There is no cast discrimination in Buddhism.

Note:  This luxury of secularism belongs to Atheists or followers of Sanatan Culture.

·       Atheist does not believe in God so the question of religion does not arise.

·       Sanatan Culture (Hindu Dharma) contains doctrines of all the religions, so all are same for it.